• Home
  • Contact Us

Call Us: (916) 467-8000

101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100
Folsom, CA 95630
Main Office: (916) 932-2312
Elk Grove: (916) 509-7096
Tim@TimOConnorAttorney.com

  • Home
  • Business
  • Personal Injury
  • Case Stories
  • Motorcycle Safety
    • A Good Defense Wins the Game
    • Don’t Lay Her Down
    • Motorcycle Helmets – Who Designed Your Helmet? Darth Vader?
    • Know Your Zone
    • Lane Splitting
    • Nine Tips for New Motorcycle Riders
  • Attorney Bio
  • Attorney Interview
  • FAQs
  • Links
    • Form Interrogatories
    • Other Links

What to Do After a Wildfire Depends On…

April 23, 2018
by Tim O'Connor
business, litigation, personal injury, real estate, settlement
0 Comment

…who you believed before the fire.

Wildfire burned home

Burned home in Weed, California; photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Although homeowners buy insurance for the total loss of the structure, a simple fact remains that getting dollars from an insurer does little to replace the memories of holidays around the dinner table, of grandkids playing in the yard, and the photo albums from decades past. Still, we must move forward and what remains to be done is to submit the claim to the insurer; receive the check; and start the process of rebuilding. But this is when the real nightmare begins — realizing that your insurer intentionally underinsured your home so that it could sell more policies than the competition.

After the 1991 Oakland Hills fire and the 2003 Southern California wildfires, legislators discovered through public hearings an additional aspect of the danger wildfires pose to homeowners: underinsurance. Legislation was enacted to remedy this situation. Nonetheless, when large wildfires struck Southern California in 2007 and 2008, state officials realized again the underinsurance problem persisted.

Data from the 2007 wildfires showed that 74% of the homeowners were underinsured by an average of $240,000. To address these concerns, the Insurance Commissioner proposed new regulations and amendments to existing regulations, and in 2010 strong and strict guidelines were put into place.

Resident who lost her home

photo by CNN

In September 2014, a forest fire ravaged the small town of Weed, California. Approximately 150 homes were completely destroyed and claims were submitted to insurers. However when checks were issued and the rebuilding began, the 2014 Weed residents found themselves trapped in the age-old insurance scam addressed in 2010, from insurers who abused the process in 2007, in 2003, and as far back as 1991.

My clients are fighting these insurers and I am disgusted with what we are uncovering: Attorneys playing slick; adjusters deceiving their insureds; agents and brokers who over-promised and under-delivered. Like the rest of us, when buying insurance to cover their homes, each owner was asked questions by the agents/brokers, like the year the home was purchased, square footage, price, foundation, etc.; each owner was told the insurer would issue a policy; and each was told that when the premium was paid, the coverage would begin. In each case, the insurer calculated the policy limits and the annual premium. The homeowners believed their insurers, paid their premiums, and found comfort knowing that their homes were protected.

When these homeowners bought their policies, they trusted and believed the insurance agents and brokers. Where are these “Good Hands” people now?

Now, after the 2014 fire, homeowners are being told by the very same insurers who calculated the limits that the coverage limits are grossly inadequate. When these homeowners bought their policies, they trusted and believed the insurance agents and brokers; they trusted and believed the “Good Hands People” of Allstate; the “Like a Good Neighbor” agents of State Farm; the brokers and agents for the insurer whose memorable jingle is, “Nationwide is on Your Side.” But where’s Peyton Manning now? Where is “We are Farmers, dum da dum-dum, da dum dum”? And where are these supposed “Good Hands” people?

When the 2014 homeowners complained to their insurers, the insurance companies responded with: Well, I guess you should not have believed us when you bought that policy.

In 2018-2020, these claims will go to trial in Siskiyou County. It’s time we come together to rebuild our town and to tell these insurers that 1991, 2003, 2007, 2008, 2010, and 2014 are far too many warnings. The question I ask now: Why should the insurers get so many warnings when the insured, who misses one single premium payment, gets a nasty letter that coverage is being canceled?

About the Author
Tim O'Connor is a Sacramento-area attorney who's been practicing law since 1990. He specializes in fighting the good fight and achieving results in and out of the courtroom for his clients. You can call him at (916) 467-8000 or email him at Tim@TimOConnorAttorney.com.
Social Share
  • google-share

Latest Case Stories

  • What to Do After a Wildfire Depends On…
  • 5 Years is a Long Time to Wait for a Courtroom
  • Landlord vs. Tenant – in the Commercial Arena

Contact Us

Name (required)

Email

Phone Number (required)

Message

About The O’Connor Law Firm

Since 1990 The O’Connor Law Firm has achieved results for clients in and out of the courtroom. We have offices in the Sacramento region, and we represent numerous clients in beautiful South Lake Tahoe. Call us at (916) 467-8000 or send us a message to find out how we can help you.

101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100
Folsom, CA 95630
Office: (916) 932-2312
Tim@TimOConnorAttorney.com
9245 Laguna Springs Drive, Suite 200
Elk Grove, CA 95758
Office: (916) 506-7096
Tim@TimOConnorAttorney.com

Activities for Tim O'Connor

Copyright © 2021 The O'Connor Law Firm               Created by KB Marketing